Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jwalsh07
Actually it's more like Darwinism that ID. The dogs lived or not depending on the environment (us). The mutations they presented were all caused naturally, and the genetic combinations were only controlled by breeding. This is artificial selection, which inspired Darwin with the idea of natural selection.

ID would be if we designed the wrinkle gene and inserted it into the Shar-Pei, or designed a spotted gene and made Dalmatians, etc.

The point here was, in any case, that speciation has been observed.

104 posted on 06/27/2006 5:54:26 PM PDT by Virginia-American
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]


To: Virginia-American

Artificial selection by definition is not natural selection, thus the mechanism is not Darwinian, it is id. Period, end of story.


105 posted on 06/27/2006 6:02:39 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson