Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Vn_survivor_67-68
From a driveability technicians standpoint for all these years of exhaust gas analysis the rule of thumb for efficiency and pollutants has been 'the higher the CO2, the better'.

The greater the proportion of produced gasses comprised by CO2, the better. On the other hand, if one can reduce the amount of work that goes into things such as drawing vacuum on the air intake or heating and pressuring the exhaust, one will reduce the amount of fuel/air mixture that needs to be fed through the engine, thus improving efficiency while reducing the production of everything including CO2.

I really don't know why more efforts aren't made toward such goals, though perhaps the tax benefits for hybrids are discouraging non-"hybrid" efficiency improvements.

8 posted on 06/26/2006 9:50:43 PM PDT by supercat (Sony delenda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: supercat

in todays cars, the ram and scavenge effects have been tweaked and exploited to the max, within practical limits for production cars.....the same is true with the variety and sophistication of fuel metering and catalyst systems.

For the treehuggers:
We need CO2 to assure that vegetation has a plentiful supply to convert to O2.


12 posted on 06/27/2006 6:09:44 AM PDT by Vn_survivor_67-68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson