There are now 321 related news stories with ever evolving ever more conclusive and definitive pro-homosexual agenda headlines on google heralding this "study" -much similar to the fanfare that homosexual agenda activists and the MSM leftist mouth peices gave the recently reported "Lesbian Brain" study that was later almost silently corrected without any fanfare...
Well, this is the third article on this study and its "suggestion" conclusion implied as definitive (versus statiscally significant scientific conclusion) that I note posted on FR (no need to post all 321 as posting junk science repeatedly does not make it more credible):
In this study the magical "fraternal birth order effect" raises its head again -another psychological theory without ANY physical biological proof premising it.
Considering the elite psychological community has declared the homosexual disorder normal without ANY scientific basis one must wonder why this purely psychological theory premised in subjective declarations exists let alone is pursued by psychologists seeking physical biological causes YET to be found? One must also wonder why other behavioral disorders attributed to the "fraternal birth order effect" seem to get published less frequently?
The cause(s) of the fraternal birth order effect in male homosexuality.James WH.
The Galton Laboratory, University College London, Wolfson House, 4 Stephenson Way, London NW1 2HE.
It has been established that the probability that a man is homosexual is positively related to his number of older brothers, but not older sisters when the brothers are accounted for. This is known as the 'fraternal birth order' effect. In the past, efforts have been made to explain this phenomenon in terms of several alternative biological hypotheses and a psychosocial hypothesis. This note examines how well these hypotheses accommodate the fraternal birth order effect. It is concluded that: (1) the evidence for the hypothesis of maternal immunoreactivity to the male fetus is weak; (2) the evidence for the intrauterine hormone exposure hypothesis is also weak; (3) the evidence for the hypothesis of postnatal learning is stronger. Lastly, there seem likely to be causes common to male homosexuality and paedophilia. They may include sexual (or quasi-sexual) experience in childhood or adolescence.
PMID: 14989531 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
-some other interesting observations attributed to the "fraternal birth order effect":
While I oppose the homosexual agenda to attempt to normalize this condition, I do think, based on the gays I've known, that some of them are born that way. Almost all will say that they always knew it...and many wish they weren't gay.
Basically my theory is this: when I was a very little girl, like in kindergarten or first grade, I had crushes on boys...many of us girls did. We didn't know what it was all about of course but still it was normal to get little girl crushes on boys. I think that gay boys felt the same way at an early age - and from what I know this was a source of confusion and agony for many for quite a while. So now they've gone overboard in trying to change society so gays no longer have to feel ashamed and confused.
I'm totally against gays trying to push their sexuality on everyone. My feeling is that they're not normal, shouldn't be normal because it's against nature, and they should just live with it...quietly. They should neither be persecuted for being gay nor should they receive special treatment.
They reject an extra-material or spiritual explanation for homosexuality a priori since they're dogmatic materialists.
For them, no proof of their theory is necessary and no evidence can exist for any other theory.