[UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide]

If a paying client is entitled to his choice of attorney or the verdict is thrown out, how do you tell the indigent client that he has less legal rights?

That is a very good question. But it is waaaayyyyy broader than this case. Paying customers are not all equal either. Not everybody gets O.J. justice. But the answer to that is to simplify procedures so there is a limit to the amount of justice for sale. See if the lawyers who write the laws will agree to that.

[Dog Gone]

Well, it's the law of the land now, but it certainly complicates things.

I am quite surprised that Scalia came down with ruling. It's out of character for him.