Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lurking Libertarian
This was a state trail and the lawyer was not a member of the state bar therefor he was not a lawyer in that state.
15 posted on 06/26/2006 1:52:19 PM PDT by HuntsvilleTxVeteran ("Remember the Alamo, Goliad and WACO, It is Time for a new San Jacinto")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran
This was a state trail and the lawyer was not a member of the state bar therefor he was not a lawyer in that state

Hardly a barrier. That's what pro hac vice motions are for.

18 posted on 06/26/2006 1:56:08 PM PDT by gdani
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran

This was a federal trial on a federal charge. The judge could have easily admitted the guy's lawyer of choice just for that particular trial, but chose not to, for whatever reason. Instead the case was handled by a proxy, who had never tried a federal criminal case before in his life.


24 posted on 06/26/2006 2:04:03 PM PDT by Blackyce (President Jacques Chirac: "As far as I'm concerned, war always means failure.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson