Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: new yorker 77
Just on what's in the article, I'd agree with Scalia. If it's a private attorney, not one provided by the State, the client should have the right to decide.
11 posted on 06/26/2006 1:44:29 PM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: colorado tanker

Not if the attorney isn't a member of the state bar where the trial is. Which was apparently the case here.


16 posted on 06/26/2006 1:53:22 PM PDT by DB (©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: colorado tanker

Scalia seems to have got one right for a change. Else we have the situation where the judge and prosecutaion (both elected by and representing The People often) get to determine who may represent a defendant. Of course, the defendant may be too stupid (or too poor) to get a good lawyer.


37 posted on 06/26/2006 2:22:17 PM PDT by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch ist der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson