Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

No Safety Lock
NRO ^ | 26 June 2006 | John R. Lott, Jr.

Posted on 06/26/2006 12:37:59 PM PDT by 45Auto

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last
To: blackie

Will that fit in a pocket, or do you need a holster?


41 posted on 06/26/2006 4:10:10 PM PDT by dsc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: glock rocks

I don't think they're teaching that book any more. I haven't run across a young person who had heard of it in a long time.


42 posted on 06/26/2006 4:11:04 PM PDT by dsc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Tijeras_Slim

I also have a 696; I don't like the rubber grips - can you suggest a nice aftermarket set of grips?

43 posted on 06/26/2006 4:29:35 PM PDT by 45Auto (Big holes are (almost) always better.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: dsc
I don't think they're teaching that book any more

They?

Well I'm teaching that book to my kids, as well as Animal Farm and others, and hell, I chose to make money as an engineer for a living. You'll probably note that the teachers who bitch the loudest tell us they're there because they love to teach children, but can't survive on the wages. Well, which is it? "Teacher" ... are you too damned stupid to get a better paying job, or are you there for the altruistic expression of love of teaching youngins?? LOL. Naw, there isn't a "they" when it comes to teaching, and the NEA and USDOE (no child left behind, my behind) should be flushed, if for no other reason than I, a taxpayer, think so.


44 posted on 06/26/2006 5:07:37 PM PDT by glock rocks ("Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats." -- P. J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: blackie
Nice gun!

I like the Sigs, among other reasons, because my left is my strong hand and I don't have to mess with the thumb safety.


45 posted on 06/26/2006 5:25:45 PM PDT by Cobra64 (All we get are lame ideas from Republicans and lame criticism from dems about those lame ideas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Lady Jag
The Sig is a brick,

Sig sauer 226 40sw? you dont like it?

I'll take it off your hands ;-)

46 posted on 06/26/2006 5:40:27 PM PDT by mylife (The roar of the masses could be farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: mylife

Sig 9, 226. It was a gift.


47 posted on 06/26/2006 5:51:03 PM PDT by Lady Jag (You can complain because roses have thorns, or you can rejoice because thorns have roses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Lady Jag

Reliable and accurate tho a bit large


48 posted on 06/26/2006 5:52:16 PM PDT by mylife (The roar of the masses could be farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: mylife

Yes, it's the big one and it's a 9 to boot.


49 posted on 06/26/2006 5:57:57 PM PDT by Lady Jag (You can complain because roses have thorns, or you can rejoice because thorns have roses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Lady Jag

Try a P239 in 40. Yep. Just right.


50 posted on 06/26/2006 7:02:21 PM PDT by glock rocks ("Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats." -- P. J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: glock rocks
Try a P239 in 40.

That'd be nice. Current Mass. laws make new guns undesirable for me. What I currently have is grandfathered. I enjoyed a prolonged buying spree in lieu of that law, so I'm good. That was just before .40s became available, however, I got some big names and some classics.

51 posted on 06/26/2006 7:07:51 PM PDT by Lady Jag (You can complain because roses have thorns, or you can rejoice because thorns have roses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Ruy Dias de Bivar
It's not about controlling guns. It is about controlling PEOPLE! Guns are just an excuse.

Damn Straight. My very real question is just how far do we let it go? When do we start recognizing the the slow descent from freedom to slavery and do something about it? Its not just guns its "sustainable growth" its "mandatory education" all to be determined by Global criminal aristocrats who want nothing more than homogeneous minds of a "classless" society in which they of course will rule. You will have no recourse as you will have no Guns, you will have no political power as they will outlaw and limit all speech of dissent labeling it hate speech. You will have no family as your children's minds will be indoctrinated from the earliest mandatory preschool program on. Dont think it can happen? Just why is the Constitution of the US being relegated to a mere historical document. I believe because it is happening, slowly for sure but steady none the less.

52 posted on 06/26/2006 7:25:45 PM PDT by Archon of the East ("universal executive power of the law of nature")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Archon of the East; Ruy Dias de Bivar
Gun Control isn't about GUNS

no nonsense support of the right to keep and bear arms

It's about CONTROL

53 posted on 06/26/2006 8:01:47 PM PDT by glock rocks ("Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats." -- P. J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: 45Auto

Get the UN out of the US!


54 posted on 06/26/2006 9:15:58 PM PDT by mugs99 (Don't take life too seriously, you won't get out alive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 45Auto

http://www.inventorscolony.com/collinscraftgrips/

I'd suggest Don Collins.


55 posted on 06/27/2006 4:47:38 AM PDT by Tijeras_Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower
If the world sought to raise itself to the high standards set by the U.S., then "global standards" might be a good thing. Since that's completely opposite to what the U.N.'s cadres of self-anointed demagogues have in mind, methinks they can kindly and without further ado shove their "standards" sideways up their arse.

Well stated! And John Lott knocks another one out of the park! (We better check both of you for intellectual steroids... :-) )

56 posted on 06/27/2006 5:30:33 AM PDT by Andonius_99 (They [liberals] aren't humans, but rather a species of hairless retarded ape.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: 45Auto
Found on an Aussie website:

Born in 1962, Peters grew up as a teenager in Costa Rica, the second of six children in an American family. As her father worked for the American Government there, 'half jokingly,' she suggested in an interview in Australia he "probably worked for the CIA." At age 15 years while attending an "alternative school" in Costa Rica, Peters was educated by itinerant "young hippies". It was during this new-age education she became "obsessed with changing the world."

In Sydney, Peters enrolled in a university in the faculty of Engineering (possibly Macquarie), being just one of only two females in the course, but in 1983 she dropped out. For a time Rebecca took a job as a researcher and reporter with ABC Radio (known locally as the "Gay-BC"), worked with Andrew Olle, but soon found the nature of journalism, 'too disposable'.

In 1991 with a not-so-subtle agenda, Peters returned to university, enrolled as a law student gaining her law degree, at the end of which, she produced a thesis on 'tighter gun control'. This was the "centrepiece" of an enormous folio of material she collected and wrote for her campaign to remove loop-holes in existing gun laws in Australia. She promoted herself as a 'multilingual middle-class lawyer' who was fanatical about "gun control".

By `91 Peters was running the NCGC, rising fast to the position of "chair", almost as quickly as the death rate climbed with each incident of that new phenomenon to Australasia, the gun massacre. Undoubtedly her success in this new global calling was to the delight of her best friend the feminist activist Eva Cox and Peters' mentor Charles Watson, Professor of Public Health at Wollongong University, who admired her for her 'intellectual thoroughness.'

In a remarkably short time she quite brilliantly bull-dozed aside the entire weak, (some treacherous), and fragmented firearm owner, sporting shooters' groups, and almost surely was surprised by her success with the shooting massacres producing a 'win-win sound-bite' for the minds and meek support of the gullible Mums and Dads of Australia. Dunblane massacre occurred on 13 March `96 and Port Arthur followed 46 days later. Then all the pieces fell into place for Federal Attorney General, Daryl Williams, to implement the gun-ban laws prepared and ready in November of 1995 by Daryl Smeaton. Job done, it was off to the "Big Apple" for Peters.

But a point to remember, while Rebecca Peters was "down-under", 6 shooting massacres occurred in Australia and New Zealand resulting in 76 deaths and 53 wounded people. In "gun control" here, Peters was no doubt - numero uno. Curiously though since Peters left, the shooting massacres have ceased! None in the last six years. And private firearms still abound.

In New York, Rebecca Peters hit the pavement 'running' and is immediately associated with Desmond Riley of the Coalition to Stop Gun Violence - part of the NAACP crowd involved in 'crafting a gun control strategy' for "curing gun ownership" - their words.

Shortly it was announced that Peters was awarded (if you believe their own news releases, or if logic is your guide, rewarded may be the more appropriate word), with a Senior Fellowship in March 1997 by the Soros Foundation's Open Institute funded Johns Hopkins Center for Gun Policy and Research in Merryland. So the good citizens there should perhaps keep her Australasian achievements in mind. In making application for her fellowship, Rebecca had to 'submit a budget' for her envisioned work - forgive me from chuckling. Can you imagine her difficult task here? Think of a big digit add lots of zeros and voila - a budget!

57 posted on 06/27/2006 6:06:13 AM PDT by Sender ("Why, by God, I actually pity those poor sons-of-b*tches we're going up against. By God, I do".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dsc
The CS9 weighs 20.8OZ.

I use a holster, I have several and I use this Action Direct model the most:


58 posted on 06/27/2006 9:17:20 AM PDT by blackie (Be Well~Be Armed~Be Safe~Molon Labe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Cobra64

Sig makes great firearms, I like the CS9 because it's lighter than most 9MM semi-autos.

I have a Taurus P-111 Millenium 9MM DAO; it's heavier than the CS9 and I keep it on the nightstand.


59 posted on 06/27/2006 9:26:43 AM PDT by blackie (Be Well~Be Armed~Be Safe~Molon Labe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson