Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/26/2006 4:14:40 AM PDT by 7thson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
To: 7thson

Here's a very strange interview with Ann about being a deadhead.

http://www.jambands.com/Features/content_2006_06_23.06.phtml


2 posted on 06/26/2006 4:24:38 AM PDT by AMiller
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 7thson

Because that's where they thought she was most vulnerable since it can be argued (especially when her quote is taken out of context) that this was her most outrageous (and offensive) statement in the book. I'm almost through it also and I think it is excellent. Thank God we have her to articulate the points she makes...


4 posted on 06/26/2006 4:28:25 AM PDT by Pharmboy (Democrats lie because they must)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 7thson

Because the Jersey Girls are, so far, the only ones who haven't publicly slimed themselves. Cindy Sheehan is over, she made a fool of herself and everyone who supported her, the others are divisive and unpleasant. The Jersey Girls, however, are relative unknowns to the American public, though since Ann's book has come out, they won't be, for long.

Consider: Now, thanks to Ann, all of America knows that the Jersey Girls DO NOT speak for all the relatives of those who died on 9/11. Thanks to Ann, all of America knows that the Jersey Girls are making a handsome living criticizing the war in Iraq and the WOT. Thanks to Ann, these formerly criticism-proof poor little victims are having the bright light of public scrutiny shone on their behavior, and what it reveals is not pretty.

I commend Ann Coulter. This past week, I bought her book, and am reading it. I've read other things she has written, and as far as I'm concerned, she is taking on the sacred cows of the left with a vigor and intelligence that is astonishing.

I admire her--she is a sort of Joan of Arc to me. She uses the truth to unmask and disarm those who wish America ill--particularly when they call themselves citizens.

I pray for Ann's safety. I pray she will continue to do battle. I honor her for the sacrifices she makes to do what she does best. I hope she profits by her work.

God bless you, Ann Coulter! I hope you read this, and know that there is a little old retired nurse out in flyover country who likes and admires you. And I am not alone. You are a credit to women everywhere.


6 posted on 06/26/2006 4:31:46 AM PDT by Judith Anne (Thank you St. Jude for favors granted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 7thson

They don't comment on the others because they are all examples of just how sleazy the Dims are, and they don't want people being reminded.


7 posted on 06/26/2006 4:32:25 AM PDT by trebb ("I am the way... no one comes to the Father, but by me..." - Jesus in John 14:6 (RSV))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 7thson

Ann has commented of how little of her book has been read by the DBM. She has said that she said much worse things about other topics.


13 posted on 06/26/2006 4:47:59 AM PDT by mathluv (Never Forget!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 7thson

Because she is right..... they are "victims" who cannot be challenged.


15 posted on 06/26/2006 4:51:01 AM PDT by libbylu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 7thson

Your input here will be helpful to keep the leftist screed out of it.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ann_Coulter


16 posted on 06/26/2006 4:51:12 AM PDT by Notwithstanding (I love my German shepherd - Benedict XVI reigns!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 7thson
We have rulez, you know!


23 posted on 06/26/2006 5:18:02 AM PDT by pageonetoo (You'll spot their posts soon enough!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 7thson
The reason that the MSM and the lest (OK, they're pretty much one and the same) are going after her on "The Jersey Girls" is because by minimizing the fact that she's targeted 4 specific political activists, and trying to get the "unwashed masses" to believe that she's taking a swipe at all widows of September 11, they're hoping to completely discredit her. "After all, if she'll say something as ridiculous and 'hateful' as that, she'll say anything!" The simple fact is that they can't repudiate anything she says using facts or evidence, so they have to try to destroy her credibility, in order to call everything she writes and says into question. Of course, if we held the left to that same standard, nobody would buy the NY Times, Washington Post, LA Times, Time, or Newsweek ever again. Or watch any of the alphabet networks, CNN, or MSNBC.

They did the same thing, with far greater success to Gary Aldrich, regarding Clinton's sneaking out of the White House for sexual escapates, which may or may not have happened. Of course, everything else in the book was right, but the MSM glommed on to that one point, and by playing it up, they destroyed his credibility. On the other hand, I did once read something about evidence of this actually happening.

Mark

27 posted on 06/26/2006 5:23:38 AM PDT by MarkL (When Kaylee says "No power in the `verse can stop me," it's cute. When River says it, it's scary!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 7thson
Why is she being attacked and skewered for her comments on the Jersey Girls?

The mainstream media attacks her because they are predominantly liberal, and her comments pose a truth that they don't want revealed.

Some Republican or conservatives don't like the way she presents her case. I believe that there's a feeling among some that "we are too good to be like her" or something like that.

I disagree with both groups - she's right and she presents her case in a manner which draws attention. And frankly, the issues that she presents in her book all deserve attention.

29 posted on 06/26/2006 5:31:21 AM PDT by meyer (A vote for amnesty is a vote against America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 7thson

Ann's first few chapters explain how the press engages in selective and unfair reporting. There you have it.

I got the book on CD; Ann reads it. I must admit that I have to replay parts because I'm laughing so hard that I can't hear her comments.


32 posted on 06/26/2006 5:33:40 AM PDT by Loud Mime ("Countdown": A documentary about Keith Olbermann's dwindling IQ.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 7thson

I enjoyed her book but the evolution chapters got a little too deep for me.


34 posted on 06/26/2006 5:46:41 AM PDT by Retired Chemist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 7thson
The core tactic of unfair critics is to take one or two points and make them the basis of an entire slam on a person. For example, Lincoln's country manner and spellings in his letters and memos was often ridiculed as marking him to be an ignorant rube. Of course, Lincoln, despite a humble background, limited formal education, and often poor spelling, was not an ignorant rube.

With Ann Coulter, none of her MSM interviewers actually read her book. Instead, in preparation for her interview, the Today Show had a staff person, perhaps even an intern, read her book for points they could toss at her to create sparks and put her on the defensive. The truth matters less than if it can be used to make her look bad -- mean, most of all.

Imagine this intern scanning through Coulter's book. Let's see: Ann says liberals are Godless, arrogant, smug, intolerant, often ignorant -- well, how can you argue with that? Ah, but Coulter slams the Jersey girls! Let's hit her on that!

And so the Today Show's unknown intern or junior staffer sets the basis for the interview with Coulter and the entire MSM approach to her new book. Somewhere, that person is bragging to friends and family that he or (more likely) she fashioned the hit interview on Coulter.

Perhaps though, even in that person's callow mind, they wonder briefly: is this really journalism, or just a shallow form of entertainment? And well, isn't it a mark of an even more deadly shallowness that an entire chorus of liberals has taken their lead? Nah, after all, we are liberals, soooooo much smarter and better than everyone else. We do not need to read books by people that we do not agree with!
38 posted on 06/26/2006 5:52:48 AM PDT by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 7thson
Why is she being attacked and skewered for her comments on the Jersey Girls?

They thought it was the one thing they could use to paint her in a bad light so we would all turn against her. They don't dare argue with her face to face on actual policy - she'd cut them to ribbons.

Re Ann's being a deadhead - I'd lot rather that than her being into Barry Manilow! The Dead is one of my "guilty pleasures" as well, but just their recordings - I wouldn't go near any of their concerts. Other guilty pleasures: Beavis and Butthead, AC/DC, communist rifles, fireworks, Sienfeld, ...anyway, love him or hate him, you gotta admit, Jerry Garcia made the world a more interesting place.

39 posted on 06/26/2006 5:54:36 AM PDT by VoiceOfBruck (optional, printed after your name on post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 7thson

Why are they over-reacting? Same old same old -- TRUTH HURTS. Ann's hit the target.


40 posted on 06/26/2006 5:58:13 AM PDT by bboop (Stealth Tutor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 7thson
The Left needs to discredit Ann Coulter. She is a powerful, effective voice for conservatism, and her observations of liberal instanity (a redundancy if ever I heard one) cut directly into that camp's appeal.

They can't condemn what she says; she's too rational and coherent. So they villainize her by selecting the "questionable" tactics she uses, especially where those criticisms are directed at figures the Left thinks are above reproach. Wrapping their defense in pathos, they feign umbrage over the "bitter, mean-spirited" assault on these pitiful widows, because they think that will resonate with a sympathetic public.

The truth is, the Left couldn't care less about the widows, they couldn't care less about ANY of the victims of 9/11 or terrorism, or the barbarians in Iraq or Afghanistan or anywhere else. All those people are just tools to discredit the administration and regain control of our political machinery.

It isn't working.

41 posted on 06/26/2006 6:05:52 AM PDT by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 7thson

They can't be bothered to actually read the book. They sieze on comments from others without doing any homework on what she actually wrote.

44 posted on 06/26/2006 6:16:36 AM PDT by Rummyfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 7thson
Why is she being attacked and skewered for her comments on the Jersey Girls?

Because rather than attacking their politics, Ann decided to attack their widowhood.

48 posted on 06/26/2006 6:39:02 AM PDT by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch ist der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 7thson
May the power of Christ compel you!

51 posted on 06/26/2006 10:40:31 AM PDT by pookie18 ([Hillary Rotten] Clinton Happens...as does Dr. Demento Dean, Bela Pelosi & Benedick Durbin!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 7thson
Why is she being attacked and skewered for her comments on the Jersey Girls?

It is a distraction from the meat of her EXCELLENT book. If she hadn't spent a few paragraphs on the harpies, the media would have found something else to use to distract from the content of the book. If you're 2/3rds of the way through the book, you know that the chapter that mentioned the harpies spent most of its time on the whole Valerie Plame/Joe Wilson fraud. It named names, stated who knew what and when, and exposed the whole mess to the light of day. OF COURSE the leftist media doesn't want that getting out, so they have to distract from it as much as possible.

By the way, I'm almost done with the book and so far it is Ann's best book yet. I've never seen anyone so surgically eviscerate the leftist fifth column in this country. She's dissected them and carefully labeled and pinned each rotten organ of the left's corrupt body politic. But Ann is just vicious enough to have performed this gruesome vivisection on a live subject.

54 posted on 06/26/2006 11:04:11 AM PDT by Spiff ("They start yelling, 'Murderer!' 'Traitor!' They call me by name." - Gael Murphy, Code Pink leader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson