This is what's so rich about all of you revisionists. You have some delusion that the WBTS was fought over slavery. But the problem is, you see, that you can't find one shred of evidence that the North went to war for that reason. It doesn't exist. Yet you strut your goodness for all to see like a preening peacock. Stupid is as stupid does. Not even A. Lincoln would sacrafice the union in order to abolish slavery. AND YOU KNOW IT.
When you want to admit that one fact I will take you seriously. Until then you are nothing more than a poorly educated, unaware, pitiful person with an agenda that has nothing to do with reality. Sorry for the attack but you aren't worthy of debate. You are a shill for public education.
Typical attempt at sophistry since I never claimed the NORTH fought about slavery. Lincoln fought to PRESERVE the Union from the Slaver assault.
However, the leaders of the South ALL repeatedly stated that THEY were fighting ONLY to preserve or extend slavery. That was the reason they lied about Norther "oppression" and had been scheming for a decade to destroy the Union.
It is Revision to claim "economic" oppression or "tyranny" was the reason the Slavers attacked the United States.
BTW attempts to put words in my mouth just makes your lack of a real argument more apparent.
The "public education" I received from my Southern schools was more in line with the delusions and lies about the "Noble Cause" which you believe to be true. But it is not difficult to discover the truth about the RAT Rebellion or its leaders' lies.
But there is a considerable body of evidence supporting the fact that the south did.