[oldtimer2]

We need to get angry and send a call to Congress , The Justice Dept, and the White House just as we did with Harriet Myers and amnesty for illegal immigrants.

We can pressure politicians in an election year and get heard.

[Paige]

It is time once again to take action. Congress needs to let the Executive know the laws must be enforced.

The time has come for the New York Times to be held accountable for aiding the Terrorists.

[muawiyah]

When the New York Times announced to the other terrorists how to evade detection by the "Swift program" they then fell within the rules of engagement.

Why they haven't been shot on sight is the real question. This lawyer fellow is a mamby-pamby for asking for nothing more than an indictment of some sort ~ he forgot this is not a criminal matter ~ it's a war ~ and the Times is now among the enemy troops.

[LowOiL]

I wish the NYslimes would just move to the Middle East and be done with it.

[Just A Nobody]

General Casey's briefing has remained a closely held secret, and it was described by American officials who agreed to discuss the details only on condition of anonymity. Word of the briefing comes after a week in which the American troop presence in Iraq was stridently debated in Congress,

This should not be rocket science. Who attended General Casey's briefing? Some "American officials" gave secret information to the NYSlimes. Round them all up and give them lie detector tests. Enough of this crap.

[Rembrandt]

I saw a picture with the address of the NY Slimes, it showed 229 but it never showed a street name. Can someone provide me the street name?

Thank you,

Osama

[dangus]

oldtimer2 is not the source of this problem, the source (the American Thinker) is, but this title is wholly inappropriate. This headline appears to say that the attorney general of the United States is calling for the New York Times to be indicted; the colon indicates that it is Gonzales speaking.

[SE Mom]

Bingo- go after em with the gloves off.

[Graymatter]

If the President and/or his team had negotiations, discussions, or frickin summits with the all-sovereign NYT, maybe the Times knows it is safe to kick sand in their eyes.
Why prosecute them if their defense is going to be, "But she didn't say 'NO.' "

[Graymatter]

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1654798/posts

According to the Weekly Standard linked at above thread:

"Asked in late May about the prospect of prosecuting the Times and others who publish classified information, he by no means ruled it out. 'There are some statutes on the books,' he said, 'which, if you read the language carefully, would seem to indicate that that is a possibility.' "

My reading of this is that (well, we don't have all the facts and the jury's out and we'll have to double-check but speaking off the top of my head there's some likelihood it appears to me that we cannot rule out that, consistency-wise,) the AG is so squishy, the line forms to the rear.

[Knitting A Conundrum]

[napscoordinator]

Conservative Judge Nepiotano (FOX News Judge) said that we cannot sue the paper. Too bad Gonzales is not conservative otherwise he may know this.

[blitzgig]

Yeah! Now you're talking. Subpoena the traitors and jail them! Show 'em we're not going to take their crap anymore! Whoo-hoo!