Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mysterio
And by striking first, they virtually guarantee their own destruction.

Mystero, since we have plenty of time here, let's go one by one and firstly I ask now - - how Israel would be destroyed by striking first/protecting themselves?

(I'll get to your other queries as we proceed)

102 posted on 06/24/2006 3:34:03 PM PDT by Sic Luceat Lux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies ]


To: Sic Luceat Lux
Mystero, since we have plenty of time here, let's go one by one and firstly I ask now - - how Israel would be destroyed by striking first/protecting themselves?

It would unite the Middle East against them, and the world would not come to their defense, as it would put Iran in the role of the victim and Israel in the role of the aggressor. We would come to their defense, giving our enemies a perfect excuse to brand us a rougue nation and unite against us. Israel's enemies might not have nukes yet, but ours do. We might be able to hold off the entire Middle East alone, but we certainly cannot hold off the entire Middle East, China, and possibly Russia without help from the rest of the world. And I'm unconvinced that our allies would rush to our aid if someone was chucking pre-emptive nukes around.
109 posted on 06/24/2006 3:44:18 PM PDT by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson