Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LibertarianInExile
what I meant I said in all seriousness.....shouldn't the rich elderly NOW be the ones taking SS cuts?.......they don't need it and most of them collected long ago whatever they paid in..

why does "SS reform" always mean that I will work longer and I will get less....

how about those already collecting taking part in the "reform" part.....

407 posted on 06/26/2006 12:40:19 AM PDT by cherry (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 406 | View Replies ]


To: cherry

I know you meant it, but it'll NEVER happen. NEVER.

Speaking as the official representative of those derided as crackpots because we're libertarians and Consitutionalists, there is simply NO WAY seniors will take a cut in their Social Security, and they vote far too consistently for any Congressional representative to fear threats from Boomers and Gen X about the issue, especially when neither group has a great track record of pressure group voting on this issue.

Reform of SS will be lucky to get SS ended. It'll never get a cut for those currently collecting. And I LIKE imagining government within its Constitutional mandates. I just don't believe that we can ever wean seniors from the teat, they're already too addicted to the pork, er, milk. The only way we can get them off the dole is to pay their way off with cash in the bank or the same sort of clear payment schedule. And even then we'll still be stuck paying for Medicare and their drugs until we get those nightmares abolished.


408 posted on 06/26/2006 1:23:18 AM PDT by LibertarianInExile ('Is' and 'amnesty' both have clear, plain meanings. Are Billy Jeff, Pence, McQueeg & Bush related?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 407 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson