Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

National Security Be Damned ... The guiding philosophy on West 43rd Street.
Weekly Standard ^ | June 24, 2006 | by Heather Mac Donald

Posted on 06/24/2006 3:35:29 AM PDT by aculeus

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last

1 posted on 06/24/2006 3:35:33 AM PDT by aculeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: aculeus
Big deal. If it's okay with the Bush Justice Department, who are we to complain?
2 posted on 06/24/2006 3:37:33 AM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Refute the Drive-By Media. Sí, Se Puede!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Quote:
the Times's new publisher, Arthur "Pinch" Sulzberger Jr ... was a sixties anti-war activist who famously declared that in a confrontation between an American and a North Vietnamese soldier he'd want to see the American get shot."
Unquote.
Stanley Kurtz (NRO on line, June 5, 2001)
3 posted on 06/24/2006 3:37:37 AM PDT by aculeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus

Maybe a Freeper with a better memory than me can help. I recollect that right after 9/11, there was editorials regarding the failure of our country to "follow the money" in regards to terrorists.


4 posted on 06/24/2006 3:43:11 AM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
BY NOW IT'S UNDENIABLE: The New York Times is a national security threat.

That bears repeating so I did!

The New York Times IS undeniably a national security threat and every patriot should henceforth REFUSE to purchase the rag!

5 posted on 06/24/2006 3:44:16 AM PDT by Bigun (IRS sucks @getridof it.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler
If it's okay with the Bush Justice Department, who are we to complain?

I have been an accountant for 30 years. It has never been my experience that unnussual banking transactions could not be investigated by federal authorities, in fact before 9/11 there were laws requiring certain transactions to be reported (ie over 10k in cash).

Do you disagree that we should be doing every legal thing we can do to protect ourselves from terrorists?

6 posted on 06/24/2006 3:46:01 AM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
BTW: The is a VERY good article - one of the best I've seen from the Weekly Standard of late.

Good post!

7 posted on 06/24/2006 3:49:32 AM PDT by Bigun (IRS sucks @getridof it.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus

Excellent piece- thanks for posting.

Seditious bastards.


8 posted on 06/24/2006 3:50:40 AM PDT by SE Mom (Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
The administration strongly urged the New York Times not to expose this classified program,

They are going to have to do a little more than "strongly urge" the socialist crook sex perverts at the NYT to stop undermining national security.

Lincoln and FDR threw jornalists in jail, apparently Bush doesn't know he can do that.

9 posted on 06/24/2006 3:51:28 AM PDT by Rome2000 (Peace is not an option)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus

Liberals would rather see millions of Americans dead than be out of power. There is literally nothing they won't stoop to. They're evil.


10 posted on 06/24/2006 3:51:37 AM PDT by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Raycpa
Do you disagree that we should be doing every legal thing we can do to protect ourselves from terrorists?

I agree. The Bush Justice Department disagrees.

11 posted on 06/24/2006 3:52:17 AM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Refute the Drive-By Media. Sí, Se Puede!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: aculeus

If what the New York Times did was so harmful then prosecute them. Aren't there enough laws on the books to find some that apply or is the Bush administration afraid of fighting the ultra liberals.


12 posted on 06/24/2006 3:59:52 AM PDT by dennisw (Muhammad and his alter-ego allah need to be discredited)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus

WE NEED TO FREEP THEIR ADVERTISERS. Does anyone know who some of their bigger accounts are? One or two names of regular large add purchasers to whom we can direct our ire. Writing to their editors is a waste.


13 posted on 06/24/2006 4:01:52 AM PDT by outofsalt ("If History teaches us anything it's that history rarely teaches us anything")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus

The New York Times is guilty of an abuse of power.


14 posted on 06/24/2006 4:03:40 AM PDT by patj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
The Nazi SOBs at the New York Times haven for terrorist should be in jail for treason. But they areleft-wing Nazi Democrats so no one will lift a hand to stop the treason as they worship their gods Hitler and Stalin.
15 posted on 06/24/2006 4:05:44 AM PDT by YOUGOTIT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

Who is leaking all this classified information and why aren't we vigorously going after them?


16 posted on 06/24/2006 4:06:16 AM PDT by maxter (Swift-Boating = exposing frauds. Let the Swift-boating begin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: outofsalt

Agreed. Target the advertisers.


17 posted on 06/24/2006 4:07:14 AM PDT by maxter (Swift-Boating = exposing frauds. Let the Swift-boating begin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler
Big deal. If it's okay with the Bush Justice Department, who are we to complain?

The Bush administration doesn't enforce the laws on illegal immigration
Now we're going to learn that it's too chickensh!t to enforce national security laws against the New York Times

But Alberto Gonzalez's Justice Department will throw the book at total idiots like this Miami Jihadist

alt

18 posted on 06/24/2006 4:08:56 AM PDT by dennisw (Muhammad and his alter-ego allah need to be discredited)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bigun

"The New York Times IS undeniably a national security threat and every patriot should henceforth REFUSE to purchase the rag!"

If they are a security threat (as we all know), why doesn't Bush direct the FBI to arrest the owner and editor and shut them down for the duration of the war. Do what Lincoln did to various newspaper publishers in the 1860's. I am sure that is well within the Executive's powers in time of war.


19 posted on 06/24/2006 4:09:24 AM PDT by MaDeuce (Do it to them, before they do it to you! (MaDuce = M2HB .50 BMG))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: maxter

Agreed, uh no wait that should read, AGREED!

So the press printed it. They would not have printed it if not for the LEAKERS! I can't believe after so many leaks that Congress or the American People are still choosing to not arrest the LEAKERS!

Are they so dang afraid of the Left, the Media, and the Press as to not prosecute those who have endangered National Security? Whistle-blowers my a**. It needs to stop, they need to spend a few months down a Gitmo.


20 posted on 06/24/2006 4:12:09 AM PDT by EBH (We're too PC to understand WAR has been declared upon us and the enemy is within.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson