[vbmoneyspender]

I don't think this part is old news:

Upon being advised that our investigation now had proof that Iran blew up Khobar Towers, Mr. Berger's astounding response was: "Who knows about this?" His next, and wrong, comment was: "That's just hearsay." When I explained that under the Federal Rules of Evidence the detainees' comments were indeed more than "hearsay," for the first time ever he became interested - and alarmed - about the case. But this interest translated into nothing more than Washington "damage control" meetings held out of the fear that Congress, and ordinary Americans, would find out that Iran murdered our soldiers.

More pertinently, I think the remarks by Berger call into question the WSJ's previous position that Berger acted stupidly, but not with ill intent, when he heisted classified documents from the National Archives.

[The G Man]

That's a great point vb. A great point. The neglect of the Clinton Administration was criminal with regard to the security of the United States of America.

I wonder just what dox Sandy stuffed down his pants?

[lancer]

Berger gets a walk for serious stuff, but Rove they want to lynch for outing the wife of a blowhard liar. Sounds like leftist justice to me...

[ConservativeMan55]

bttt

[GOPJ]

Upon being advised that our investigation now had proof that Iran blew up Khobar Towers, Mr. Berger's astounding response was: "Who knows about this?" His next, and wrong, comment was: "That's just hearsay." When I explained that under the Federal Rules of Evidence the detainees' comments were indeed more than "hearsay," for the first time ever he became interested - and alarmed - about the case. But this interest translated into nothing more than Washington "damage control" meetings held out of the fear that Congress, and ordinary Americans, would find out that Iran murdered our soldiers.

Freeh's a good man - and he should have headed up the "Page Investigation" - what is Danny Boy thinking?