Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Czar
You're right about the word trust.
IMO, there's way more to why the U.S. Solicitor General purposely ignored, and stayed away from Kelo v. City of New London immanent domain then we're being told.   A year later, the recent meaningless EO doesn't mesh with the intent of 04-108, or in fact the U.S. government isn't even mentioned, because they don't practice it. The EO is really misleading!

Appointed U.S. Supreme Court Justices judges, should never have the authority to usurp, or rewrite our Constitution without being pulled on the carpet, or to be taken to task.   The Court's role is to be guardians of the Constitution, and to safeguard government intrusion on the public, and instead, not to legislate or redo it by a five man fiat.

 

243 posted on 06/24/2006 5:12:54 PM PDT by Smartass (Believe in God - And forgive us our trash baskets as we forgive those who put trash in our baskets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies ]


To: Smartass
"Appointed U.S. Supreme Court Justices judges, should never have the authority to usurp, or rewrite our Constitution without being pulled on the carpet, or to be taken to task. The Court's role is to be guardians of the Constitution, and to safeguard government intrusion on the public, and instead, not to legislate or redo it by a five man fiat."

Agree completely. Of course, they've been doing it for so long by now they're almost on autopilot.

244 posted on 06/24/2006 5:27:09 PM PDT by Czar ( StillFedUptotheTeeth@Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson