Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TexasCajun

Fox News Special report is spending some time on various aspects of this report,....had a clip of Cheney in Chicago commenting....he was unhappy with the news media that choose to publish ....


19 posted on 06/23/2006 3:20:41 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (History is soon Forgotten,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: All; Dog; NormsRevenge; SierraWasp; Grampa Dave; Marine_Uncle
Jim Angle interviewed the Stuart Levy Treasury Official that oversees the Program,...gives detail on the Safeguards, ....which seemed extensive.....

From Website:

New York Times Refuses to Hold Surveillance Story

*****************************AN EXCERPT ******************************8

New York Times Refuses to Hold Surveillance Story
Friday, June 23, 2006

NEW YORK — The Bush administration and The New York Times are again at odds over , this time with new reports of a broad government effort to track global financial transfers.

The newspaper, which in December broke news of an effort by the to monitor Americans' telephone calls and e-mails, declined a White House request not to publish a story about the government's inspection of monies flowing in and out of the country.

The Los Angeles Times also reported on the issue Thursday night on its Web site, against the Bush administration's wishes. The Wall Street Journal said it received no request to hold its report of the surveillance.

Administration officials were concerned that news reports of the program would diminish its effectiveness and could harm overall national security.

FOX Fan Speakout: If you were president, would YOU ask the press not to publish stories that might diminish the effectiveness of criminal investigations?

"It's a tough call; it was not a decision made lightly," said Doyle McManus, the Los Angeles Times' Washington bureau chief. "The key issue here is whether the government has shown that there are adequate safeguards in these programs to give American citizens confidence that information that should remain private is being protected."

(Story continues below)


20 posted on 06/23/2006 3:33:55 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (History is soon Forgotten,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

It's about time that some enterprising Freeper att'y started a class action against the MSM who reveal these secrets. It could be done on behalf of the citizens of the USA because the media dolts have undermined our safety and security. In addition, the leakers who released the info (probable Rat civil servants) to the media should be labeled as "John/Jane Doe" defendants. The ACLU and the sleazeball trial attorneys have hurt us enough. Let's turn the tables!


21 posted on 06/23/2006 3:36:01 PM PDT by reformedjournalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson