To: All
Hello FRiends,
When your lib acquaintances try the "those are old, pre '91 shells, so they don't count" canard, here is your answer:
"The person who dies or is sickened by way of sarin or mustard gas doesn't care about the year of manufacture."
9 posted on
06/23/2006 11:21:16 AM PDT by
SaxxonWoods
(Free Iran! WARNING! Forbidden Cartoon: .. . *-O)) :-{>. . . .)
To: SaxxonWoods
""The person who dies or is sickened by way of sarin or mustard gas doesn't care about the year of manufacture."" Indeed!
You know what depressed me? How many conservative bloggers were dismissing the WMD evidence. Our side of the fence on this issue needs a morale boost me thinks, because everyone seems so beaten down and jaded.
11 posted on
06/23/2006 11:24:38 AM PDT by
Impeach98
(Anti-war protestors should try holding rallies in Damascus and Tehran!)
To: SaxxonWoods
"The person who dies or is sickened by way of sarin or mustard gas doesn't care about the year of manufacture." Somewhere on FR yesterday, there was a post about how every so often in France, someone will unearth a 90-year-old WW1 mustard round and accidentally detonate it and die in the process.
14 posted on
06/23/2006 11:30:24 AM PDT by
bassmaner
(Hey commies: I am a white male, and I am guilty of NOTHING! Sell your 'white guilt' elsewhere.)
To: SaxxonWoods
When your lib acquaintances try the "those are old, pre '91 shells, so they don't count" canard, here is your answer: When they say that the shells are old and degraded, they mean that they can't still be used as ammunition in a cannon. That does not mean that they can't be used as an IED or in a car bomb.
-PJ
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson