[highlander_UW]

You know, I've just finished a couple of days corresponding with one of the editors at a local newspaper (SeattleTimes). I asked why they didn't even acknowledge the announcement. Essentially, they were in the process of writing a piece on it and it's taken them days to do so...but more interestingly, just as your cartoon suggests, he didn't view this as significant whatsoever. He says they are pre 1991 and had been identified and were under UN seal at the time of the start of the war, so they're not any proof of anything as they were already known. That's where the liberal media is going with this.

[McBuff]

The amazing thing to me is how quickly and illogically our team allowed the libs to jump from "WMD's have not been found" to "there never were WMD's and Bush lied."

It's like if your son had been arrested in the past for drug abuse and then several neighbors, friends and family start telling you they have seen him using drugs again. You notice his eyes are bloodshot and his speech is slurred. You go into his room and do a search but find nothing. ..do you conclude there are no drugs or do you conclude that he hid them well?