Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RDTF
Is this clown trying to coin a new term? This weapon/effect already has a name, and it's "EMP" (Wiki: ElectroMagnetic Pulse), not E-Bomb. AFAIK, it's one effect of a nuclear explosion.
6 posted on 06/22/2006 2:45:47 PM PDT by TChris ("Wake up, America. This is serious." - Ben Stein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: TChris
An EMP bomb, sometimes called an E-bomb is NOT a nuclear device. It is a bomb that can generate an EMP pulse powerful enough to damage circuitry but is nonnuclear.

It is a threat, but is more complex to make than a basement IED type bomb. It requires a level of engineering that we have not yet seen in any terrorist attack.
23 posted on 06/22/2006 3:00:05 PM PDT by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: TChris
Is this clown trying to coin a new term?

No. There are an entire range of ways to generate an electromagnetic pulse using a non-nuclear pump. The simplest and most familiar couples a flux compression generator to a radiator -- a conventional explosive powered design. There are some alternative generator designs, but it quickly gets into classified space.

While not particularly complicated in theory, building these from scratch with reliable results requires a certain amount of precision engineering prowess. The Russians arguably did a lot of the pioneering work on these types of devices, and have sold such devices to a few different countries on the record, who knows who has gotten ahold of them off the record.

The limitation is their range. They can generate fields that have nuclear EMP strength, but the power quickly drops off after tens of meters meaning they have to be close to an unshielded target to have a good effect. Disruptive? Yes, but not at the level the scaremongers are suggesting. They are primarily useful against RF communications infrastructure, which is necessarily vulnerable.

27 posted on 06/22/2006 3:04:01 PM PDT by tortoise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: TChris
Check out this link [popularmechanics.com].
34 posted on 06/22/2006 3:29:15 PM PDT by Mike-o-Matic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson