Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GourmetDan

ml1954: So where's the evidence the universe is 6000 years or so old?

GourmetDan: Actually, there is no evidence that the universe is not 6,000 years old

ml1954:What a strange world world you live in.

GourmetDan: See, I knew you had no evidence.

I think this exchange speaks for itself.

942 posted on 07/13/2006 3:04:45 PM PDT by ml1954 (NOT the BANNED disruptive troll who was seen frequently on CREVO threads.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 936 | View Replies ]


To: ml1954

"I think this exchange speaks for itself."

Only because you are using abstract thought. How metaphysical of you.


943 posted on 07/13/2006 5:23:05 PM PDT by CarolinaGuitarman (Gas up your tanks!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 942 | View Replies ]

To: ml1954

Maybe you got confused by the double-negative.

Stated positively, that would be that there is no evidence that the universe is more than 6,000 years old. There are only interpretations of evidence that claim that the universe is more than 6,000 years old.

You can present your evidence (if you think there is any) and I will teach you the difference between evidence and interpretation of evidence.


948 posted on 07/14/2006 10:34:26 AM PDT by GourmetDan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 942 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson