[Stultis]

But hey, a snappy comeback beats arguments and evidence every time.

But all arguments, and any evidence that we might dare to draw inferences from, are all "metaphysical" according you you, because they involve "abstract thought". And what's more, they can always be interpreted in more than one way and so MEAN NOTHING. Why argue seriously any further once you've revealed yourself as an intellectual relativist and nihilist?

[GourmetDan]

If you cannot effectively counter claims that your arguments and evidenctiary inferences are metaphysical and cannot uniquely support evolution, then you merely prove me correct.

But the 'intellectual relativist' and 'nihilist' charge is cute.

Sounds really cool and I bet the little evos loved it.

[Coyoteman]

Evidence and Its “Interpretation”