Sorry, just because it is 'based' on evidence doesn't mean that it isn't 'assumed'.
Except in the evolutionary dictionary, that is, where it is a requirement.
That's part of the deception.
And Behe 'excepts' common descent?
Actually, there is no evidence that the universe is not 6,000 years old. If you can tell the difference between evidence and intepretation, of course. I'm betting that you can't.
Actually, there is no evidence that the universe is not 6,000 years old.
What a strange world world you live in.