[js1138]

And we all knew that if he doesn't believe in Darwinism, he isn't a *real* scientist, doesn't really understand evolution, is damaged goods, etc etc etc...

I'd be willing to bet that not one in a hundred of these signers could provide, in their own words, a coherent three sentence outline of evolution.

I bet you can't either.

I've been participating in these threads for nearly five years and have not seen an evolution critic post an acceptable description of how evolution works.

[GourmetDan]

I've been participating in discussions of evolution for longer than that and I've never seen an evolutionist give a coherent explanation of evolution that wasn't merely 'defined truth'.

Any other definition was easily demonstrated to be metaphysical.

[GourmetDan]

I've been participating in discussions of evolution for longer than that and I've never seen an evolutionist give a coherent explanation of evolution that wasn't merely 'defined truth'.

Any other definition was easily demonstrated to be metaphysical.