Thank you for the courtesy ping.
I tend not to trust the scientific accuracy of creationist websites. I have examined a lot of them, and have yet to see much in the way of real science. They may be fine when the science does not disagree with their positions, but when there is a conflict between their religious beliefs and science, then real science goes into the dumper and pretzel science takes over.
For example, the site you link to in your post has this in its "focus" page as the first item:
Origins.org focuses primarily on the scientific theory known as Intelligent Design and reaches one logical conclusion: that the universe and life show verifiable signs of intelligent creation because there is an intelligent Creator. Some of our resources deal with scientific data exclusively and some take the defensible position that the data point to and support the Biblical claim of Divine Creation.
I think you will see that Dr. Paul Chien isn't an advocate of pretzel science.