Nothing about 'selection' that is inconsistent with a created genome that is in decline.
Nothing about 'variation' acted on by 'selection' that is inconsistent with a created genome that is in decline.
Nothing about 'evolution' at all that is inconsistent with a created genome that is in decline.
No unique evidence that supports evolution-only at all.
This makes 'evolution' metaphysical.
BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
So none of these qualify, eh?
29+ Evidences for Macroevolution: The Scientific Case for Common Descent