I think this is an example of why we should never assume someone is an expert simply because they are brave or foolish enough to open their mouth and make a conclusive statement about something. The continued emphasis in the media on the assumed fact that these chemical weapons were too old to be useful bothered me because of the hair splitting nature of the statement but now that the UN (of all places) has helped cast doubt on how useless or degraded these weapons could be it becomes clear that some deprogramming is in order because I like so many had sat silently an accepted the distasteful meal served up by the media. I think that the whole WMD coverup in the media will come unraveled eventually. We know that large numbers of drums of "pesticides" were found as well as the raw materials one step away from being combined into deadly chemical weapons.
http://www.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/meast/08/13/iraq.chemicals/
http://edition.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/meast/04/14/sprj.irq.labs/
Interesting preware look at WMDs in Iraq:
http://www.iraqwatch.org/perspectives/csis-WMDIraq.pdf
Great point. How many things have went around in the media concerning this war that were already proven false, but never recognized in the media? This is how they maniplate the masses, then take polls.
The point is that can these still kill a lot of people? Reference: Kurds.
Are they banned under UN resolutions?
Didnt Iraq have the responsiilty to hand them over?
The left claim its 12 years ago, like we should shrug it off and its irrelevant. They worry more about depleted uranium in Iraq! What a joke! Yeah, like I will ever trust them with national security.
Thanks for the info, I will look into that, it will always help me read the documents with better information so I do not miss important stuff in these documents.