I don't need to be convinced or swayed, I knew it was a missile(2) when I saw the assinined" CIA "debunking" attempt.
The military claimed no assets in the area...that was a lie.
The CIA and FBI are lying, I'm studying the recent released (partial) "data" the CIA/FBI used to fake the witness cartoon.
The data they used (or faked) shows the 747 climbing 2000ft in 9.4 seconds at 420mph for a climb rate of 12,000fpm!
Ask Rokke how many airliners are able to perform those specs with the nose intact????
http://raylahr.entryhost.com/ciadoc.pdf
(page 16, get ready for chuckle)
And OJ couldn't have been guilty. Fell back over and ROTFLMAO.
I've always thought it was terrorists. We had been "hit" several times by them including in 93 at the WTC. I figured they had claimed no military in the area because the terrorists got away. Who'd want to admit that with our military near the scene?
We see a linear, steady decay in speed from position markers 0 to 4, or about 20 seconds. At position 5, its ground speed has dropped to 110kts.
Would the Clinton/Reno sapsuckers out there please explain to me why the 747 doesn't show a vertical ascent profile (12,000FPM) nearer the explosion coordinate (0), like we see at position 5(), on the color graphic???
Dot "0" is the last transponder "hit", nose is gone between "0" and "1", I expected to see a serious reduction in airspeed, relecting the 12,000FPM climb and slowdown, trading speed for at least 2 to 3000 feet of altitude.
If the witness saw a 747 ascending like a missile, then why is there no record of it in the radar composite? Additionally, explain why all the trouble to LIE about TWA800's performance? Isn't THAT a kick in the face to the excellent production family that made the 747?
The dedicated pilots and crew?
The still greiving survivors, who have to deal with this lie, like salt in a wound, reopened when more lies are exposed by patriots donating their OWN time and money to get to the bottom of this cancer infected scandal.