Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: U S Army EOD

Question: If the explosion was internal, wouldn't the metal from the plane show an outward bend? I haven't been able to find anything that confirms one way or the other which way the blast was going. Have you?

The conspiracy on all of this is quite simple - don't want to freak out the American public so that we'd stop flying for fun. Make it a mechanical problem - ask Richard Clarke - he concluded that before any evidence was given to him. All about re-election and the economy.


69 posted on 06/22/2006 10:37:41 AM PDT by Sioux-san (God save the Sheeple)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]


To: Sioux-san

According to the documentary, the explosion was internal. When the wall of the fuel tank failed, this caused a stuctural part of the aircraft to fail also. The aircraft started to split a the bottom and it continued to the top behind the cockpit of the aircraft. It literally tore itself apart.

I would be more leary of flying based on what I saw in the documentary than if it was hit by a missile. The documentary basically meant under the same conditions, any 747 or aircraft with the same basic design of the fuel tanks could have the same thing happen to them.


74 posted on 06/22/2006 10:44:56 AM PDT by U S Army EOD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson