Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Hal1950
Ok, F&W saw a "huge" explosion at 7500', -- check.

The initial event that disabled the 747 took place at about 13,800 feet at about 8:31:12.

Check, there was a 'less huge' initial event explosion [center fuel tank, supposedly] at 13,800'...

Two readily apparent fireballs? I don't believe there were any such witnesses. If you can locate any, please post them here.

Are you denying the fact that 'something' exploded, blowing the nose off of flight 800, initiating the crash?

Which [the initital event?] is clearly in conflict with the first radio report at 8:31.50 of that fireball explosion.

Not at all. F&W saw a "huge" explosion at 7500' at 8:31.50. -- Read their report. -- They did not report seeing "the initial event" -- the 'center tank explosion' at 13,800', 38 seconds earlier. .

The first radio report of the huge fireball explosion was at 8:31:50 - 38 seconds after the initial event.

Some here claim there was 41 second interval between the 'center tank' explosion @13,800' and the 'huge' one at 7500'.

Which is clearly in conflict with the first radio report at 8:31.50 of that fireball explosion.

No, its not in conflict, as F&W did not report "-- the initial event that disabled the 747 took place at about 13,800 feet at about 8:31:12. --"


-- So?
Is this 38 second interval critical?

Nobody can concoct a palatable "missile(s) shootdown" scenario with those facts.

If so, -- how does anybody concoct a palatable "center tank explosion" scenario with those same facts? -- Can you tell me?

The conspiracy theorists - and press - jumped to the erroneous conclusion on the night of the disaster that the huge fireball explosion was TWA 800 blowing up at 13,800 feet at 8:31:12. The report of Faret & Wendell and the ATC tape make it obvious that isn't what happened.

Fine. -- You tell all of us what happened. We await your brilliant solution..

1,252 posted on 07/03/2006 7:37:17 PM PDT by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1250 | View Replies ]


To: tpaine
http://raylahr.entryhost.com/Summary%20Judment%20Opp%20-%20NET.pdf

Hmmmmm, somebody's not to proud of their work product.

1,253 posted on 07/03/2006 8:30:54 PM PDT by radialenginefan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1252 | View Replies ]

To: tpaine

You've garbled your post by inserting comments where none belong, including in what are supposedly quotes from me, to the extent that I'm not going to try to unravel it.


1,259 posted on 07/03/2006 9:24:38 PM PDT by Hal1950
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1252 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson