Posted on 06/21/2006 9:01:43 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Bush administration will have to explain why it thinks it can ignore or overrule laws passed by Congress in a hearing next week, Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Arlen Specter said on Wednesday.
Specter, a Pennsylvania Republican, said he hoped to force the Bush administration to reduce its use of "signing statements" -- memos that reserve the right to ignore laws if the president thinks they impinge on his authority.
"Our legislation doesn't amount to anything if the president can say, 'My constitutional authority supersedes the statute.' And I think we've got to lay down the gauntlet and challenge him on it," Specter said in a telephone interview.
A Justice Department official is scheduled to testify at a hearing on signing statements next Tuesday, Specter said.
Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, who had lunch with Specter on Wednesday, will face questions about the presidential memos when he appears before the committee on July 18 to discuss the National Security Agency's domestic spying program.
Bush has signed at least 750 such memos since taking office in 2001, according to the Boston Globe, more than previous presidential administrations combined.
Bush has used signing statements to signal that he might bypass a ban on the torture of U.S.-held prisoners and ignore new provisions in an anti-terrorism law that call for increased congressional oversight.
Specter said the heavy use of signing statements fits in with a larger pattern of overreaching by the Bush administration, from the NSA's surveillance program to a first-ever raid on a congressman's office as part of a bribery probe.
Trying to legislate against signing statements probably would not work, Specter said, but there might be other ways to force the administration to curb their use.
"Maybe we can find some pressure point on the budget or appropriations or confirmations or something of that sort," he said. "I'm thinking about all the alternatives."
A White House official said signing statements help the public understand how a given law will be enforced and can provide guidance to courts as they interpret it.
"They are used appropriately and the content is consistent with that of past presidents," White House spokeswoman Dana Perino said.
Specter has clashed with the White House in recent months about the spying program and recently accused Vice President Dick Cheney of meddling in his committee's affairs.
Specter has been trying to reach a compromise with Cheney and other officials on legislation that would allow a special court to review the surveillance program.
"We've made some progress on it but I'm not prepared to give you the details," he said. "This is a major matter for them that they have not yet finished."
Explain to me again why the Bush admin back Spector over Toomey?
This from the fruitcake that relies upon Scottish law...
Wonder if it has anything to do with the fact that about 90% of what comes out of the congress is unconstitutional?
Ah geez, will someone please tell him to put a sox in it.
Go ahead and challenge to your black RINO's heart's content, Arlen... You'll lose.
If Congress wants to amend the Constitution, it knows how to do it. Passing a statute isn't enough.
We don't have a congressional dictatorship in this country even if 75 Senators wish it were so.
Oh, please, Senator. You started meddling in their affairs first.
Isn't it the Presidents job to do this? Or did I miss something?
To think that Specter believes that whatever he says goes...
Sounds to me like he needs to read up on Constitutional law a little more...
- plewis1250
Then Bush should have the cajones to veto the legislation, rather than sign it into law and simply chose not to follow it.
Yeah. What's up with that anyway?
Spincter hasn't had a clue since that day long ago when he dreamed up the "Magic Bullet".
The man is a nut.
Except that Specter doesn't control budget or appropriations, and can be cowed on confirmations by Orrin Hatch and John Kyl.
There are no pressure points, Arlen. And you seem to be the only one who's got his BVDs bunched up over these signing statements.
Appears as tho the President has given himself the authority to use the line item veto...
As much as I disagree with Arlen on most everything, I think he's on the right track with this one...
"Spincter hasn't had a clue since that day long ago when he dreamed up the "Magic Bullet"."
I think he is one of the few surving participants of the Warren Commission. Except of course for Gerald Ford, the only non-elected President of the United States.
Can anyone here spell P-A-Y-B-A-C-K?
"Sign your name. Make a law. Neat."
--- President Bill Clinton on executive orders
You got it Brad. This is exactly what the Admin.
has been trying to do. Too bad there are RINO's
in the senate who have no clue what grass roots
Republicans are all about.
Mahalo for your post.
Obviously with Spincter, we have a Republican the left can adore.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.