something meeting the criteria that Bush, Cheney, Rice, Rumsfeld and Powell set for WMDs before we invaded.
I think many different definitions were used, but I would think an ACTIVE, post-1991 WMD program would suffice, whether it is nuclear, chemical or biological.
I just don't buy that Rick Santorum of all people would be the one to break the news of finding WMDs in Iraq.
Saddam was supposed to certifiy that he was rid of WMDs.
He couldn't and didn't.
The US never had the burden of proof.
HOWEVER...with all that has been found plus all the evidence of pre war transfer, there is no truth to the "Bush Lied" mantra.
There were and are chemical weapons in Iraq.
Do you consider about 400 gallons of mustard agent in one location to be insignificant? I saw it and I didn't consider it insignificant.