"Fox News’ Jim Angle contacted the Defense Department who quickly disavowed Santorum and Hoekstra’s claims. A Defense Department official told Angle flatly that the munitions hyped by Santorum and Hoekstra are “not the WMD’s for which this country went to war.”
The liberals then say they are degraded weapons and are no threat, so they really aren't WMDs.
My responses is that the reason fro the UN Sanctions were to find and destroy all of Iraq's WMDs and the onus was on Iraq to do so. 500 degraded shells filled with nerve agents are still extremely lethal from all I have read and heard. It would be great to hear from someone who can verify this.
Hey, maybe the libs won't mind a few of those "degraded" weapons being shipped directly to their offices in DC. I mean, since they are 'no threat' as they say.
It's hard to know which group is worse for humanity, the DIMS or the terrorists! Getting harder to tell them apart, too.
I heard a Tim something or other also on H&C last night, who said the mustard gas would likely be unusable because it would clog the devices, however the sarin would remain highly dangerous and indeed would have to admit "Iraq had WMD". Democrats are wrong.
That's was this guy said who was not a pol but an analyst or something. (wrote some book)