Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Peach

Santorum's statement tries to explain why there was so much time taken to declassify:(a) fear the terrorists would realize that stuff was out there (b) fear of revealing intel sources


277 posted on 06/21/2006 6:46:13 PM PDT by the Real fifi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 265 | View Replies ]


To: the Real fifi

(b) fear of revealing intel sources

Is where I would put my money.


280 posted on 06/21/2006 6:48:07 PM PDT by bnelson44 (Proud parent of a tanker! (Charlie Mike, son))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 277 | View Replies ]

To: the Real fifi

HEADS UP EVERYONE:

I don't know how many of you are getting freepmails from a person who signed up today called Australiansavy.

I've gotten two thus far.

This person is saying that WMD pose no threat to soldiers in Iraq.

Someone posted directly from the unclassified report upthread. It says clearly that WMD pose a threat to coalition forces.


282 posted on 06/21/2006 6:48:44 PM PDT by Peach (Iraq/AlQaeda relationship http://markeichenlaub.blogspot.com/2006/06/strategic-relationship-between.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 277 | View Replies ]

To: the Real fifi

Let's not forget what the leftists said about WMD when Clinton signed the Iraqi Liberation Act in 1998 (which called for regime change):


"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line." President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program." President Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face." Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983." Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs." Letter to President Clinton, signed by Sens. Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others Oct. 9, 1998

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process." Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

"Hussein has chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies." Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999


291 posted on 06/21/2006 6:51:22 PM PDT by Peach (Iraq/AlQaeda relationship http://markeichenlaub.blogspot.com/2006/06/strategic-relationship-between.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 277 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson