To: GrandEagle
2 Reasons why this is significant to me:
1. Saddam told everyone that EVERYTHING had been destroyed.
2. One soldier I know was present when delivery devices and precursor chemicals were dug out of the sand in Iraq. I can only assume it wasn't announced because the result would only be folks saying: "Precursors aren't the same as WMDs."
249 posted on
06/21/2006 6:32:03 PM PDT by
xzins
(Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It. Supporting our Troops Means Praying for them to Win!)
To: xzins
It's now time to flood the Internet with this information. No point in keeping anything back now.
252 posted on
06/21/2006 6:34:32 PM PDT by
bnelson44
(Proud parent of a tanker! (Charlie Mike, son))
To: xzins
1. Saddam told everyone that EVERYTHING had been destroyed.
I never said it was not significant (at least I don't think I did). I just don't think it is the "smoking gun" we need.
Your point is very valid. No matter where they came from, he did say they were gone.
Cordially,
GE
To: xzins
"Precursors aren't the same as WMDs."
Yes, I'm sure that would be the lib/MSM spin -- but how long does it take to turn precursors into WMDs? Seconds, minutes, days, longer? If you have the precursors and you have the delivery devices, do you have WMDs or is there still some elaborate process of manufacture? Anyone know?
396 posted on
06/21/2006 10:05:50 PM PDT by
Enchante
(General Hayden: I've Never Taken a Domestic Flight That Landed in Waziristan!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson