Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Scarchin

I don't know if THIS means anything...but just the other day..Rush Limbaugh was saying that he knows some things that he CANNOT reveal re: WMD's..

But, he did imply that what he knows would definitely absolve Bush from the criticizm of going to war when there were no WMD's.

It isn't Drudge..and he didn't actually say anything...BUT....


82 posted on 06/21/2006 2:53:52 PM PDT by Txsleuth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: Txsleuth

omg yes he did, I'm so excited!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

cnn is ingnoring it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! LOL LOL


87 posted on 06/21/2006 2:54:31 PM PDT by angcat ("IF YOU DON'T STAND BEHIND OUR TROOPS, PLEASE, FEEL FREE TO STAND IN FRONT OF THEM !")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]

To: Txsleuth

Even Rush should know it won't absolve Bush - even on Fox just now they said they were old pre-1991 weapons and the only thing that it proves is he lied about destroying them, not that he had an active program.


358 posted on 06/21/2006 4:34:14 PM PDT by RDTF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson