oh, dear, another argument against a strawman.
pgyanke, are you capable of EVER stating things honestly?
I have explicitly stated that I am displeased with Coulter's ERRORS OF FACT, SLOVENLY CITATIONS, and INACCURATE/DISTORTED PRESENTATION.
At what point have I EVER insisted that Coulter is wrong based on her refusal to accept the ToE?
NEVER.
At what point have I castigated YOU for refusing to accept the ToE?
NOT ONCE.
What have I hammered you with, in fact? Your constant refusal to specify exactly how many examples of Coulter's errors you desire, what degree of refutation of those errors you require to be coerced to publicly admit they are indeed errors, and/or a commitment to explain exactly what fault you find in those refutations should you decide to claim they are not compelling.
With every successive distortion and excuse you put forth, you become ever more fully the servant of my purposes on this thread.
I am not in the business of trying to teach a pig to sing when it serves my purposes just as well to allow a pig to wallow in its own filth before all the world.
Do you get it now? If you accept the terms of the challenge, you serve my purposes. If you refuse to accept the terms of the challenge, you serve my purposes. If -at this point- you flee, you serve my purposes. If, instead, you scream for help, you serve my purposes.
It is entirely up to you to decide which way of serving my purposes causes you the least damage. In my opinion, your best option is to accept the terms of the challenge.
You had your chance--I didn't waste time reading your post. Take a hike.