Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pgyanke

no, but nice strawman. I have no ill will towards the faithful. I do, however, have a well-justified distrust of creationist proponents. The two do not equate.

all you need to do is define your requirements concretely.
I do not require you to accept evolution, but I do require you to concretely state the number of examples of Coulter's errors and the degree of refutation which will force you to admit that she has in fact erred.

The information I sent along to Chances Are has roughly ten examples of Coulter's errors, all from a span of a mere three pages of "Godless". It has significant rebuttal of her assertions, including corrections of fact, presentation, and citation/source.

Now, AGAIN:
Is the number OF ERRORS sufficient for you?
If you find the refutation OF THOSE ERRORS compelling, will you be man enough to publicly admit it?
If you find the refutation OF THOSE ERRORS insufficient, will you CONCRETELY explain EXACTLY what flaws you find in them?

In sum: DO you have the spine I'd expect of a conservative, or instead, grotesquely like the "Bush LIED!!!" crowd, do you NOT?

Once again, for the umteenth time, the choice is and ever has been entirely yours to make.

SO MAKE IT.


261 posted on 06/26/2006 10:20:50 AM PDT by King Prout (many complain I am overly literal... this would not be a problem if fewer people were under-precise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 257 | View Replies ]


To: King Prout
Whoop dee doo. King Pout has ten things listed (so far) where Ann Coulter is in error (I have only asked for one--repeatedly).

Where is it?

Nowhere to be found.

Why?

Because he isn't man enough to put his work out in the public domain for open criticism--as did the object of his angst, Ann Coulter.

Why don't I just take his stupid pledge?

Why should I? I haven't put any requirements on him in this debate, why should I be the only one constrained. He goes into the debate with a pledge of capitulation from me... where's his? Frankly, I think his "belief system" is every bit open for scrutiny as is mine. I tire of explaining the same things over and over as I'm sure he does... that's life. He might be even surprised at the debate (since he keeps ascribing attributes to someone he knows nearly nothing about).

Also, I want him to post it here not in my FReepmail box.

Does EVERYONE have to take the pledge before it can see the light of day?

Either...

No. Then why is it just me?

or

Yes... Then we'll never see it (as I suspect is the goal).

265 posted on 06/26/2006 11:52:07 AM PDT by pgyanke (Christ embraces sinners; liberals embrace the sin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson