I also have the right to be factually correct, as I am in this case and intend to remain.
to you and all the other idolatrous Ann-droids out there:
How about you concretely define the number of examples of error found in chapters 8-11 you require, and what degree of refutation you desire for each, that will coerce you to admit that Ann Coulter, on this topic, does indeed consistently display bogus citations, factual and analytic error, and ludicrously false/distorted presentations throughout her diatribe against evolutionary science?
ADDITIONALLY:
How about you pledge your honor and word here and now to abide by your stated requirements (once you pony them up) and swear to publicly admit that you are in error and Ann is, on science, a talentless hack?
I looked and looked but couldn't see anything concrete yet in all of your protestations about Ann... this one included.
Here's a hint: rather than dancing around telling us how much smarter you are than Ann Coulter, why don't you actually cite something... just one thing! I've been waiting all through this thread for you to get specific and nothing so far has been more specific than she "consistently display[s] bogus citations" [NAME ONE], she commits "factual and analytic error" [NAME ONE], and provides a "ludicrously false/distorted presentation" [DUH... IT'S HER BOOK. GO WRITE YOUR OWN IF YOU WANT TO PRESENT ALL SIDES OF EVERY ARGUMENT. OTHERWISE, SHOW WHERE SHE'S FALSE.].
So. Put up or shut up... pick something she is wrong about and show us just how wrong she is. I'll check back from time to time to see about your progress...