To: soccermom; najida
Seems I'm in good company in my opinion on Ann Coulter's work. Would you like to take issue with Mark Steyn as you did with me for making many of the same points the other day?
For reference: Coulter's Crudeness
13 posted on
06/21/2006 9:36:53 AM PDT by
pgyanke
(Christ embraces sinners; liberals embrace the sin.)
To: pgyanke
Does it really bother you THAT much that we all don't agree with you?
I have a brain,
I use it....
A am an individual.
84 posted on
06/21/2006 11:28:24 AM PDT by
najida
(The internet is for kids grown up-- Where else could you have 10,000 imaginary friends?)
To: pgyanke
LOL! Uhhhhhh.... Did you read the last paragraph of his editorial? For all his blather which, incidentally is no different from what all those in "the Coult" have been saying, he finally admits my point. The "strategerie" never worked in the first place! Got it????? The voters never have fallen for the "victim" stunt. He noted Ann is inadvertently doing Democrats a favor. The American people were onto them all the time. Ann didn't "expose" anything. It seems that is what I was saying!
As for Steyn's claim that no one else was pointing this out before Ann, I suppose I dreamed up the exchange between O'Reilly and Letterman. O'Reilly was able to call Sheehan for what she was, without attacking her and he didn't back down from Letterman when Letterman tried the "how dare you say that" tactic. Also, as I mentioned in the other thread, Rush Limbaugh was a pioneer in exposing this "strategerie" with the Ron Brown Funeral video clip.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson