Oh, really? And micro-evolution stops where? At speciation? The creation of a new genus? And what limits the continued divergence of "micro-evolved" populations? Science has identified no such stopping force. The positive evidence is that it doesn't exist. Just for one instance, the fish-to-elephant transition seems to have been about 50 steps of "microevlution."
Let's look at it from another angle. Are there created kinds distinct from all others with no hint of evolution from a common ancestor? Not that science can find.
Too bad more EVOS aren't truthful enough to admit there is no evidence for macro-evolution.
We don't "admit" it because it's not true. About 29 lines of evidence agree.
No evidence for one species evolving into another- none, nada, zilch, zippo.
Wrong, as shown above.
OK - read your link re: About 29 lines of evidence agree. Sorry, but I still dis-agree.
That basically proved to me that talking with an EVO is not much different that reading more of their 'conclusions.' Simply and continually jumping to conclusions that are not supported by scientific evidence.
Basically I'm left with "how can (macro) evolution be considered a fact (?) when no one can explain how it works!!!" Where's the empirical evidence?
Also are you in any way linked with the Wesayso corp.? /sarc/