Simply and continually jumping to conclusions that are not supported by scientific evidence.
I gave you probably the best available summary of the evidence. You'd better hope no one else read it. Much of it cannot credibly be spun as "common design."
We see the forensic trail in the molecules. The ERV stuff is particularly hard to call "design."
We see the forensic trail in modern species, including ring species. We see it in the fossil record.
But here, maybe a different compilation: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1437264/posts?page=52#52.
Says you - I believe my profile page asserts my position(s) rather succintly.
Also I think the biggest divide between creation/evolution arguments is simply - Do you believe in God? After that many assumptions kick in to supposed 'rational' thought processes.
Lastly, I've reviewed much evolution evidence and don't benefit at all from summaries nor philosophies. I do appreciate anything that links to cold-hard facts. Stuff that sticks to the scientific methods and shows all the work. I know no proof is conclusive but it's nice to see all the facts that lead any scientist to a conclusion - no matter what his/her bias. Even better is when they can also openly state their assumptions.