Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: js1138

The same basis anyone would use to argue Piltdown was a fake. The facts.

Piltdown Man was exposed as a fraud back in 1953. Where were you?


166 posted on 06/21/2006 10:37:28 AM PDT by BaBaStooey (I heart Emma Caulfield.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies ]


To: BaBaStooey

Piltdown is considered a fake because it is incompatible with evolution. My question was, on what basis would a creationist argue it is a fake?


170 posted on 06/21/2006 10:40:31 AM PDT by js1138 (Well I say there are some things we don't want to know! Important things!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies ]

To: BaBaStooey
The same basis anyone would use to argue Piltdown was a fake. The facts.

But "the facts" in question are what evolutionists say they are. You accepting evolutionists as auhorities now?

173 posted on 06/21/2006 10:40:44 AM PDT by Oztrich Boy (Soliphism explains so much I'm suprised everyone doesn't believe it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson