To: js1138
The same basis anyone would use to argue Piltdown was a fake. The facts.
Piltdown Man was exposed as a fraud back in 1953. Where were you?
166 posted on
06/21/2006 10:37:28 AM PDT by
BaBaStooey
(I heart Emma Caulfield.)
To: BaBaStooey
Piltdown is considered a fake because it is incompatible with evolution. My question was, on what basis would a creationist argue it is a fake?
170 posted on
06/21/2006 10:40:31 AM PDT by
js1138
(Well I say there are some things we don't want to know! Important things!")
To: BaBaStooey
The same basis anyone would use to argue Piltdown was a fake. The facts. But "the facts" in question are what evolutionists say they are. You accepting evolutionists as auhorities now?
173 posted on
06/21/2006 10:40:44 AM PDT by
Oztrich Boy
(Soliphism explains so much I'm suprised everyone doesn't believe it.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson