Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Evolution: World science academies fight back against creationists
PhysOrg.com ^ | 21 June 2006 | Staff

Posted on 06/21/2006 8:33:46 AM PDT by PatrickHenry

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 641-646 next last
To: Jedi Master Pikachu

"You're stating your own religious belief, not a fact, stormer."

Ah, young Master, you have reached understanding. You may not recognize it yet, but you have spoken wisely.


121 posted on 06/21/2006 10:11:07 AM PDT by MineralMan (non-evangelical atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: Jedi Master Pikachu
"You're stating your own religious belief, not a fact, stormer."

I have no religious belief, and that is a fact.
122 posted on 06/21/2006 10:11:43 AM PDT by stormer (Get your bachelors, masters, or doctorate now at home in your spare time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
"In various parts of the world, within science courses taught in certain public systems of education, scientific evidence, data and testable theories about the origins and evolution of life on Earth are being concealed, denied or confused with theories not testable by science," the declaration said.

Well, in this part of the world, children are being taught a theory not testable by science. It is called evolution. Everything else is being concealed.
123 posted on 06/21/2006 10:11:59 AM PDT by BaBaStooey (I heart Emma Caulfield.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: js1138; VadeRetro

Evolutionists seem to be trying to stop inquiries, inquiries into the validity of macroevolution (microevolution generally does not involve adding genetic information, but often deleting it).


124 posted on 06/21/2006 10:12:17 AM PDT by Jedi Master Pikachu ( www.answersingenesis.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan
I know. Pretty soon it is going to come over here, rub up against my leg, and expect me to feed it. Darned Egyptians!

Hope you've got Bast and not Sobek.


125 posted on 06/21/2006 10:13:23 AM PDT by VadeRetro (Faster than a speeding building; able to leap tall bullets at a single bound!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan
I have two of those household goddesses my self. I do not doubt their omniscience.
126 posted on 06/21/2006 10:13:42 AM PDT by stormer (Get your bachelors, masters, or doctorate now at home in your spare time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
"Let's go! AAAAAAAAAAAAAaaaagggghh!!!"


"Ack! Ack ack ack, ack!"

127 posted on 06/21/2006 10:13:47 AM PDT by DoctorMichael (A wall first. A wall now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: BaBaStooey

"Well, in this part of the world, children are being taught a theory not testable by science. It is called evolution. Everything else is being concealed."



That's odd. In my part of the world, children are being taught lots of things...in their homes...in their churches...in their schools. Many of those things are not testable by science.

Where is the concealment of which you speak. Are you not teaching your children your beliefs?


128 posted on 06/21/2006 10:14:25 AM PDT by MineralMan (non-evangelical atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: Jedi Master Pikachu
Had one micro-lawyer on this thread already so I'm going to one-size-fits-all you.
129 posted on 06/21/2006 10:16:05 AM PDT by VadeRetro (Faster than a speeding building; able to leap tall bullets at a single bound!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Jedi Master Pikachu
Evolutionists seem to be trying to stop inquiries, inquiries into the validity of macroevolution (microevolution generally does not involve adding genetic information, but often deleting it).

What is your measure of information?

130 posted on 06/21/2006 10:16:11 AM PDT by js1138 (Well I say there are some things we don't want to know! Important things!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: stormer

Everybody has a religious belief. Atheists usually worship either themselves directly or indirectly (worshipping Creation (the Universe), humanism, etc.).


131 posted on 06/21/2006 10:16:29 AM PDT by Jedi Master Pikachu ( www.answersingenesis.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro

"Hope you've got Bast and not Sobek."

Indeed! Either way, it must be appeased or the consequences are not pretty. I've had to clean out more than one pair of shoes due to tardy offerings.

I believe the one that lives with me is the most recent incarnation of Fat Freddy's Cat.


132 posted on 06/21/2006 10:16:43 AM PDT by MineralMan (non-evangelical atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: Oztrich Boy

>>>origins of life on Earth.>>>

Which is still a THEORY.
You mean it might not exist? Just a figment of my imagination?>>>

Yes, you are some non-bodied entity in space that is imagining this whole planet and all it inhabits, lol.


133 posted on 06/21/2006 10:16:59 AM PDT by sandbar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Jedi Master Pikachu

Incorrect.


134 posted on 06/21/2006 10:18:31 AM PDT by stormer (Get your bachelors, masters, or doctorate now at home in your spare time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan
I have the same curse upon my household. The fat God in question is on a diet and thus particularly surly.
135 posted on 06/21/2006 10:19:06 AM PDT by VadeRetro (Faster than a speeding building; able to leap tall bullets at a single bound!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: Jedi Master Pikachu

"Everybody has a religious belief. Atheists usually worship either themselves directly or indirectly (worshipping Creation (the Universe), humanism, etc.)."

Flawed is your understanding, oh young master. Worship atheists do not. Believe in supernatural entities they do not. Religion have they not. Ponder this well.


136 posted on 06/21/2006 10:19:54 AM PDT by MineralMan (non-evangelical atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: Jedi Master Pikachu
You're stating your own religious belief, not a fact, stormer.

Prove it.
137 posted on 06/21/2006 10:19:57 AM PDT by BritExPatInFla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan

(1) I don't have children

(2) Are you aware of what children are being taught in public schools?

(3) My post was meant to address that which is being taught in public schools (and most private schools) and the information contained in pretty much all biology textbooks.

The idea here is that the religion being taught by the state is Darwinism. Other religions need not apply.


138 posted on 06/21/2006 10:20:50 AM PDT by BaBaStooey (I heart Emma Caulfield.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: BaBaStooey

"(3) My post was meant to address that which is being taught in public schools (and most private schools) and the information contained in pretty much all biology textbooks.

"

Say what you mean to address, then. Be specific with your statements. Public schools are not the only place children are taught.


139 posted on 06/21/2006 10:22:03 AM PDT by MineralMan (non-evangelical atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: js1138
"That might be interesting if the alleged Designer had any attributes. Shutting off inquiry is not what science is about."

You read too much between the lines.

Knowing that the B-29 was "designed" did not prevent the Soviet engineers from "reverse engineering", and subsequently manufacturing, a duplicate. They also learned a lot in the process - and subsequently applied that knowledge.

>>Tell us something about the Designer that would be useful or which would suggest further research.<<

The incredible diversity, yet similarity in all he designed. The less one knows about a designer, the more research would be "suggested". The Bible would be the primary source and His creation would be the secondary.

Any person with normal God given curiosity would want to do further research in one or both of these realms.
140 posted on 06/21/2006 10:22:51 AM PDT by RobRoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 641-646 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson