Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MACVSOG68
I deny that, given the story by the school backed up by the playground aids that it was a simple fight between two boys who are actually friends.

Deny it all you wish; however...

But perhaps you or Parker (who also posts here) can name a few of these "bullies" and their families who promoted this attack?

Diversion?

As much as you would like to imply Mr. Parker's son was not led to a secluded area by others -it happened. As much as you would like to imply the beating did not happen -it did. Even if refering to what I consider to be the biased investigative report from the School administration puiblished by the Superintendent one can see it did in fact happen:

PRESS RELEASE: June 16, 2006

On May 17, several first graders were involved in a disagreement over who would sit where in the cafeteria. As a result, upon going outside one child took another by the hand and brought him to a third student in an area of the playground that is somewhat difficult for the adults to see. (The student who was hit said that he went willingly.) All children who saw agreed that the third student then hit the student who had been brought to him two to four times in the chest/abdomen (children’s accounts vary) and he fell to his knees. The student who was hit says he was hit when down; the other children say he wasn’t. One child reports that one student held the arm of the student who was hit; however, the child who was hit and the other children did not report this. The children involved named five children who were nearby watching but not directly involved. Several other students were close enough to see a cluster of students but not close enough to see what was happening. The student who did the hitting suggested that others also hit, but none of them did so.

The rest of your posting contained nothing relevant -as such nothing to refute or debunk from a conservative perspective...

92 posted on 06/21/2006 12:13:15 PM PDT by DBeers (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]


To: DBeers
Diversion?

Yes, when the charge is that 8 to 10 boys abducted and assaulted a seven year old boy because his father has filed a lawsuit, it wouldn't hurt to name one or two. I can just see the police investigation now. "Mr. Parker, you say 8 to 10 boys dragged your son behind the school and administered a beating?" "Yes, that's correct". Mr. Parker, can you name any of the attackers?" "Officer, what kind of a question is that? You're just creating a diversion." And DB, You're serious, aren't you?

Even if refering to what I consider to be the biased investigative report from the School administration puiblished by the Superintendent one can see it did in fact happen:

Please point out to me in the press release where 8 to 10 boys dragged the Parker boy behind the school and beat him in his chest, stomach and genitals and kicked him when he was down, planned well in advance, encouraged by the parents who were out to get even with Parker for his lawsuit. I must have missed that, but it is encouraging to note that even you no longer believe that crap. But I'll give you credit for attempting to make a silk purse out of a sow's ear.

100 posted on 06/21/2006 12:58:35 PM PDT by MACVSOG68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson