No, you are incorrect. The school assured Parker that no sexual instruction of any type would take place in the early years. He wanted more, and wanted assurances that any discussion that included same sex anything not take place until he was notified. The school said that was impossible because someone might ask a question about one of the books, or ask a question on the playground. No school could agree to that.
And again no, parents do not have the ability to opt out of every single thing a school presents. His lawsuit is now centered on formal instruction, which the school had already agreed to.
As much as you may not realize it anything homosexual is disordered and a majority of people do not want anything homosexual to be taught as normal to their children...
kinda funny then that Parker left his son in the school for the second straight year, now isn't it? Sure hope the poor child isn't damaged for life....
Discussing graphically specific sex acts is but one extreme aspect of all the aspects of homosexual disorder not to be discussed and normalized by educators unless parents allow it.
I agree totally with that.
NO -you are incorrect -David Parkers specific demands are clearly laid out and detailed in his lawsuit. IF his demands were met the lawsuit would necessarily go away. You can read all the detail here: (copy provided by local the homosexual activist group opposing David Parker)...
Lexington C.A.R.E.S. homosexual activist organization: copy of Parker-Wirthlin Lawsuit
kinda funny then that Parker left his son in the school for the second straight year, now isn't it? Sure hope the poor child isn't damaged for life....
Actually the only thing funny is the insistence upon ascribing to what are objectively unknown motives something illegitimate when clearly what is known entails a legitimate cause, that of opposing the homosexual agenda...