Never a personal attack, unless attacked first. I leave that to your friends who can do nothing but attack. In fact, I would love to engage in a substantive discussion of this and other issues. You've still not said explicitly what you want referenced. If you are referring to the Article 8 report, it does quote Mr. Parker, who gave them the interview. Since Parker, and only Parker could have been the source, it is up to him to vet the story or to object to anything said there. Once he chose not to, it is his story. In any case, you said you agreed with it completely. Is that your question?
There are many spins in this story from both extremes -here is but one> -- in essence, David Parker stated he felt this attack was related to his noteriety and opposition to the homosexual agenda in the school...
Note he feels it is possibly related -period... He could be wrong which is not a big deal...
However, there is a big difference between what David Parker has stated and what those attempting to dipsarage David Parker attribute to him e.g. specifically, the claims that David Parker stated that homosexual activist parents planned the attack...