To: mjaneangels@aolcom
This second asset group was owned by the people who had the lease, that was P & O, which was what the discussion is about, and it was British owned not American. The fact that there is a lease or rental agreement creates assets seperate from the original assets.Everybody who looked at the deal understood that immediately, so the issue was whether such a distinction had any real practical and enduring seperation or enhancement for security functions that we could rely upon. The disagreements revolve around that very thing. And the consensus was that there was a real problem with this. The deal was killed.
110 posted on
09/07/2006 6:56:01 PM PDT by
Paul Ross
(We cannot be for lawful ordinances and for an alien conspiracy at one and the same moment.-Cicero)
To: Paul Ross; mjaneangels@aolcom; 1rudeboy
Everybody who looked at the deal understood that immediately Everybody but you.
111 posted on
09/08/2006 7:07:17 AM PDT by
Toddsterpatriot
(Why are protectionists so bad at math and reading?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson