"The assets were the U.S. terminal operations [ hoot ] 2 seconds."
No, the assets were leases that P & O owned. British, not American.
The leases that were implicated in the CFIUS review were for American terminal operations. Hence, an "asset" whatever rules of book-keeping you want to employ. This is not rocket science and none of the lame responses by the Globalists to date shows the least recognition of the reality. If you note, CFIUS didn't reject its jurisdictional oversight on your grounds. They merely bungled their assessment of the risks...and intentionally so. As if signing paper "Assurances" of abiding by our laws...suddenly make deep and profound porous security problems go away...