The city needs to rule the court illegal.
I've heard that various groups are going to get a human chain going, in case they try to remove the cross. I've heard some quoted as saying that they will have to go through a large group of people if one day they send guys up to that mountain in a truck with tools to dismantle the cross.
This case shows how twisted the legal system and the interpretation of the establishment clause in the 1st amendment has become. As pointed out, this monument isn't an establishment of religion. Also, even if we accept the premise that a religious symbol doesn't belong on public land, the city has tried at least 3 land sales or donations that I know of, and the courts have overruled every single one. The courts have overruled every attempt of the city to dispose of the land so it wouldn't be on public property. Then recently this judge comes along and says the cross has to come down, though there are other appeals pending elsewhere in the legal system.
If there were a monument or statue up there in praise of the "Gay and Lesbian" community, do you think we would be having lawsuits to remove it?