Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/20/2006 9:25:41 AM PDT by radar101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: radar101

There are no words for what I think of the judge in this case.


2 posted on 06/20/2006 9:30:07 AM PDT by ANGGAPO (LayteGulfBeachClub)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: radar101
Lousy liberals just cannot stand people worshiping or taking comfort in anything other then their own twisted "religion" of liberalism.

Ann Coulter really nailed it. No wonder they despise her so much.
4 posted on 06/20/2006 9:32:03 AM PDT by Eagles Talon IV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: radar101

Is the city precluded from selling the plot of land upon which rests the cross?


5 posted on 06/20/2006 9:32:49 AM PDT by Sgt_Schultze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: radar101
AS anyone can see, this is a MEMORIAL TO VETERANS. It is not a church. It is not claimed by any religion. ONE ATHIEST and his ACLU attorney want it gone. Our Judiciary goes along with those two instead of 76% of San Diego City voters.
6 posted on 06/20/2006 9:33:23 AM PDT by radar101 (The two hallmarks of Liberals: Fantasy and Hypocrisy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: radar101

IF the issue is the cross being on federal land...then what could be the objection to transferring the land to a non government owner? Federal property is routinely sold and transferred.

This surely sounds like judicial hostility to religion, and a spiteful judge for sure...similar to the judges' personal animus against Terry Schindler's family.

Has the self-same atheist vet sued to have crosses removed from Arlington and other Veteran's cemeteries? Also maintained at federal/state expense.


9 posted on 06/20/2006 9:35:39 AM PDT by silverleaf (Fasten your seat belts- it's going to be a BUMPY ride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: radar101

This will sound pretty vindictive but I like the image.

A lot of money is being spent on this case and, while there is a slight, very slight, chance that the judge will be reversed on appeal, the more likely outcome is that the cross will come down.

Why not let the cross come down, buy the house directly across the street from the judge's house (make the present owners an offer they simply can't refuse), tear it down, create an appropriate park, and put it up there? If necessary, get a special use zoning ruling to permit it's installation. Now certainly neither the judge or the athiests could object. It would, after all, be on private land. And it would be a fitting memorial to one of the judge's most important cases.

Not likely to happen but fun (for me anyway) to imagine.


12 posted on 06/20/2006 9:46:09 AM PDT by Captain Rhino ( Dollars spent in India help a friend; dollars spent in China arm an enemy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: radar101

Can't Arnold do anything?


14 posted on 06/20/2006 9:57:02 AM PDT by Hildy ("Whenever someone smiles at me all I see is a chimpanzee begging for its life." - Dwight Schrute)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: radar101

On a hill far away stood an old rugged cross,
the emblem of suffering and shame;
and I love that old cross where the dearest and best
for a world of lost sinners was slain.

So I'll cherish the old rugged cross,
till my trophies at last I lay down;
I will cling to the old rugged cross,
and exchange it some day for a crown.


15 posted on 06/20/2006 10:11:43 AM PDT by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: radar101
Mayor Jerry Sanders has said that if the delay isn't granted, the city would comply with the judge's order.

Grow a pair Sanders, and tell this judge to stick it.

20 posted on 06/20/2006 12:03:07 PM PDT by jrp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: radar101
If it was any other religious symbol, I think it would still be there. Its never been about religion and state; that's simply liberal camouflage for the Left's loathing of Christianity. In a nutshell, this is what has been at the heart of the San Diego case from the outset.

(Denny Crane: "Every one should carry a gun strapped to their waist. We need more - not less guns.")

25 posted on 06/20/2006 10:22:04 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson